Comments on: Domaining Is More Than Speculation

By: Premium Domainer

Premium Domainer — Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:50:53 +0000

David – My personal favorite is “Domain Name Investor” which I think is probably the clearest and most accurate.

By: David

David — Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:49:29 +0000

Of course I agree Wikipedia and others should not be labeling domain name registrants by saying or implying a “domainer” is a cybersquatter.

However, with that said I still believe it would be good to also consider using an alternatie word to describe ourselves because of the overall negativity, especially with trademark interests and attorneys being real tough to overcome.

If you still want to identify yourself as a domainer that is fine but an optional description for those a little uncomfortable with being a ‘domainer’ would be good to have. Any ideas on alternatives?

By: Speculating on Domain Names « Dog Byte Domains

Speculating on Domain Names « Dog Byte Domains — Sat, 08 Aug 2009 17:07:27 +0000

[...] Premium Domains » Domaining Is More Than Speculation The latest trick is to request that Wikipedia eliminate the Domaining page, and just merge it with a page entitled %26ldquo;Domain Name Speculation%26rdquo;. There is no logic or persuasive points articulated by these dissenters. … [...]

By: Chris J. Politzki

Chris J. Politzki — Sat, 08 Aug 2009 02:29:53 +0000

Thanks for sharing this info. I’m trying to learn the ropes on this stuff and every bit helps!

Thanks again!

Chris

By: Wikipedia Labeling All Domainers as Cybersquatters - Page 5 - DNForum - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars

Sat, 08 Aug 2009 01:18:33 +0000

[...] and why it would not be proper to whittle Domaining down to just pure domain name speculation. The response on my blog. The response at Wikipedia – Look for "Merge is not Appropriate" near the bottom. [...]